Götz, F. M.*, Maertens, R.*, & van der Linden, S. (2022). Let the algorithm speak: How to use neural networks for automatic item generation in psychological scale development. Psychological Methods. Accepted for publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m6s28
Maertens, R.*, Götz, F. M.*, Schneider, C. R., Roozenbeek, J., Kerr, J. R., Stieger, S., McClanahan, W. P., Drabot, K., & van der Linden, S. (2022). The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gk68h
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Herzog, S. M., Geers, M., Kurvers, R. H., Sultan, M., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(3), 547–573. https://journal.sjdm.org/22/220228/jdm220228.pdf
Uenal, F., Sidanius, J., Maertens, R., Hudson, S. T. J., Davis, G. K., & Ghani, A. (2022). The roots of ecological dominance orientation: Assessing individual preferences for an anthropocentric and hierarchically organized world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, Article 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101783
Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315 [Altmetric score > 900] [Selected for APA Spotlight]
Maertens, R., & van der Linden, S. (2021). A psychological vaccine against fake news. Microbiologist, 22(1), 14–17.
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., McClanahan, W., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Disentangling item and testing effects in inoculation research on online misinformation: Solomon revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(2), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420940378
van der Linden, S., Cook, J., Maertens, R., Goldberg, M. H., Kerr, J. R., Lewandowsky, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2021). Do climate change consensus messages cause reactance? A comment on Chinn and Hart (2021). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kqsfz
van der Linden, S., Goldberg, M. H., Maertens, R., Kerr, J. R., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2021). The effects of consensus messages and the importance of a pre-test: A comment on Chinn and Hart (2021). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6fua5
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Basol, M., Kácha, O., Rathje, S., & Steenbuch Traberg, C. (2021). How can psychological science help counter the spread of fake news? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, Article e25. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.23
Maertens, R., Anseel, F., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Combatting climate change misinformation: Evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, Article 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101455